Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York: When Supreme Court vs. Surrogate’s Court Is the Right Forum
Beneficiary disputes don’t always start (or end) in Surrogate’s Court. In New York, the right court often depends on whether the dispute is tied to a decedent’s estate administration—or whether it’s primarily a dispute between living people or competing claimants that does not require the Surrogate’s Court’s estate-focused jurisdiction.
Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York – The quick rule of thumb
A dispute is often Surrogate’s Court–appropriate when:
A dispute is often Supreme Court–appropriate when:
- The dispute is between living people and does not meaningfully depend on estate administration, or
- A stakeholder (like an insurer or bank) brings an interpleader because there are competing claims to the proceeds. Interpleader is expressly governed by CPLR 1006 and is commonly filed in Supreme Court.
And as New York courts regularly note, Surrogate’s Court jurisdiction—while broad—does not extend to truly independent controversies between living persons that don’t relate to a decedent’s estate proceedings.
Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York – What “beneficiary designation disputes” usually involve
Disputes often arise over:
- Life insurance beneficiary changes
- Retirement accounts (IRA/401(k) and similar)
- POD bank accounts / Totten trusts and TOD brokerage registrations
- Annuities and other pay-on-death transfers
These assets typically transfer by contract or account registration and are paid to the person(s) named on file—often outside probate—so the forum question becomes crucial when someone challenges the designation.
Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York: Disputes typically handled in Supreme Court
1) Disputes between living people before any death occurs
If the account owner is alive and the dispute is about a beneficiary change (for example, allegations of undue influence by a caregiver, or a fight among family members over who “should” be named), those are usually not Surrogate’s Court matters because Surrogate’s Court is focused on decedents’ affairs.
Common Supreme Court tools in “living-person” disputes include:
- Injunctive relief (to restrain distributions or changes, depending on facts)
- Declaratory judgment actions
- Claims relating to capacity, fraud, duress, or fiduciary wrongdoing during lifetime transactions
(Note: If an Article 81 guardianship is involved, that is also a Supreme Court proceeding because it concerns an incapacitated living person.)
2) “Beneficiary vs. beneficiary” fights with little estate involvement
Sometimes the estate is not a meaningful party (or has no claim that the asset belongs to the estate), and the fight is essentially between two living claimants about who should receive non-probate proceeds. Those disputes frequently proceed in Supreme Court—often via interpleader or contract/equitable claims—because they are not necessarily about administering estate assets.
Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York: Disputes typically appropriate for Surrogate’s Court
Surrogate’s Court is often the right forum when the dispute is bound up with the estate—especially when an executor/administrator (or temporary fiduciary) needs the court’s help to investigate, marshal, or recover property.
1) Estate fiduciary challenges a POD/TOD/beneficiary transfer as wrongful and seeks recovery
If the estate contends that assets were wrongfully diverted (for example, through undue influence, fraud, lack of capacity, or forged paperwork), Surrogate’s Court proceedings may be used to discover information and seek turnover of property claimed to belong to the estate.
Two commonly used SCPA proceedings are:
- SCPA § 2103 (Discovery/Turnover): allows a fiduciary to obtain information and pursue property alleged to be withheld from the estate.
- SCPA § 2105 (often called “reverse discovery” in practice): permits a claimant (often the person holding/claiming the property) to seek a Surrogate’s Court determination regarding ownership as against the estate fiduciary.)
In addition, Surrogate’s Court has incidental powers to determine a decedent’s interest in property claimed to be part of the gross estate or available for distribution, and to determine the rights of competing claimants in that context.
2) The dispute is part of (or affects) estate administration
If resolving the beneficiary issue is necessary to determine what property is available to pay estate debts, expenses, or distributions, Surrogate’s Court is often a natural forum because it is already overseeing the fiduciary, accountings, creditor issues, and distribution framework.
3) A claimant wants an estate-centered ruling to stop ongoing estate demands
When someone (like a POD beneficiary or joint account holder) is being pressed by an executor/administrator to return assets, a Surrogate’s Court ownership determination can be an efficient way to resolve the estate-related controversy in the same court handling the estate proceeding.
FAQ: Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York (Supreme Court vs. Surrogate’s Court)
Usually, no. Assets with a beneficiary designation—like life insurance, IRAs/401(k)s, and many POD/TOD accounts—generally pay to the named beneficiary on file, even if a will says something different. A dispute typically focuses on whether the designation is valid or enforceable.
Often, yes—especially when the dispute is tied to estate administration (for example, the estate claims the designation is invalid due to undue influence, fraud, forgery, or lack of capacity, or the fiduciary needs discovery and turnover remedies). Surrogate’s Court is frequently the right place when the dispute is estate-centered and involves marshaling or recovering assets.
These cases are evidence-driven. The most helpful proof often includes:
the beneficiary forms (and change history),
the timeline of changes and who assisted,
medical/cognitive records near the time of the change,
communications (texts/emails),
witness testimony (financial advisors, caregivers, friends, clinicians).
That fact pattern is commonly litigated. Courts look closely at the circumstances of the change, the decedent’s vulnerability, dependence, isolation, and the presence (or absence) of independent witnesses and documentation.
Deadlines vary based on the claim type, the asset, and the court/procedure (and delays can make evidence harder to obtain). If you suspect wrongdoing, it’s smart to get advice early—sometimes the first priority is preserving records and preventing dissipation.
They can. In some cases, a divorce judgment, stipulation, or waiver may matter—but certain retirement assets may also involve federal rules that change the analysis. The plan type and governing documents are critical
RK Law PC Can Help Resolve Beneficiary Designation Disputes in New York
RK Law PC represents clients in New York beneficiary designation litigation, including Surrogate’s Court discovery/turnover proceedings and Supreme Court interpleader and related actions.
For more information, please contact NYC Probate Litigation, Guardianship, Probate, and Estate Planning attorney Regina Kiperman:
Phone: 917-261-4514
Fax: 929-556-2089
Email: rkiperman@rklawny.com
Or visit her at:
40 Wall Street
Suite 2508
New York, NY 10005
Visit Regina on LinkedIn
Visit Regina on Facebook
This page is made available by the lawyer for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the lawyer. The post should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.